Deputy Kirsch: Nasirov has not caused damage to the state, giving installments
True
Such an opinion in his interview to “RBC – Ukraine” expressed the people’s Deputy Alexander Kirsch.
“In article 100 of the Tax code says that a taxpayer may ask the tax credit, but tax authorities should not just provide it, and are obliged to study the issue and act according to the law. When there is a collateral, not to provide installments would be weird. If there is a guarantee in the form of fixed assets, in which case that can be sold by including them in a tax lien, it is not a risky operation. It is quite advantageous, because it involves not just interest at the rate of NBU, in the amount of 120% of this rate. That is, for banks with this level of collateral and at this rate it would be beneficial,” said Kirsch.
According to the MP, the damage is actually caused not Nasirov, giving credit, and the NAB and the Prosecutor’s office because the company suffered loss of reputation, partly suspended, and therefore, reduced the tax base.
“This installment is not often provided because it is believed that the budget risks. But in this case there was no risk, because there was a potential of collateral and interest. Where is the loss? And, moreover, where the intent Nasirov? If there was a real loss for the budget, this is still not enough for the prosecution because we need to prove that Nasirov did with some benefit for themselves personally. On the basis of article 100 it is impossible to prove,” said Kirsch.
As reported, from the beginning of the trial Nasirov Kirsch wrote that the charge, which is based on article 100 of the Tax code, absurdly, because, giving businesses (regardless of the names of their owners) tax installments, Nasirov not only caused damage to the state, and Vice versa – has earned for him.