Poroshenko will hold consultations before to sign the controversial amendments to the law on e-declarations

Before you sign the controversial amendments to the law “On prevention of corruption”, President Petro Poroshenko will hold consultations Castelnau planned changes, which require public organizations to report on income. It is reported by Interfax.

See also:

Media professionals and civil activists may be required to submit an e-Declaration

According to the head of state, the relevant draft law of Parliament has already passed to the presidential Administration, which had previously been signed by the speaker of the Verkhovna Rada Andrei Parubiy.

“When finalizing the draft law, all the soldiers-contractors, the soldiers of the Junior officers in full except for those who work in administrative positions related to the financial liability in full in the bill came in … He joined up, now for the return will be held the necessary consultations, we will respect the wishes”, – said Poroshenko.

See also:

Parliament approved the idea Poroshenko to change the law on electronic declarations

We will remind, on March 23, deputies of the VR adopted amendments to the law on e-customs Declaration, according to which representatives of public associations are obliged to submit reports on their income, and soldiers from such need should be free.

We will note, earlier people’s Deputy from the faction “people’s front” Tatiana Chornovil his amendment proposed to introduce e-Declaration and for individuals who are founders (participants), editors (the editors) media. But in the discussion the proposal was withdrawn because the journalists do not receive salaries from the budget and not live on taxpayers ‘ money, unlike civil servants.

Add that new amendments to the law “On prevention corruption” received a great response among the international community. The US government, the UK and the EU urged the Ukrainian Parliament to reconsider the new changes and refuse from their implementation, which in their opinion, is “a step backward” that could interfere with the reform process of our country.

Comments

comments