Due to the adoption of the judicial reform Dobkin came from the opposition bloc, as Novinsky wanted a new platform
MP Mykhailo Dobkin has decided to withdraw from the Opposition bloc, and Vadim Novinsky wanted to create a new opposition platform inside the unit after the approval of the judicial reform.
About his intentions, he said on Facebook.
“All together, the so-called “dictatorial” laws of January 16 to any comparison do not go with the decision taken today, shame on the judicial “reform”. And again. Today, I’m non-partisan” – he wrote.
All together, the so-called “dictatorial” laws of January 16 to any comparison do not go with the decision taken today is a disgrace to the judicial “reform”. And again. Today, I’m non-partisan.
Published by Mikhail Dobkin October 3, 2017
Meanwhile, Novinsky in connection with the vote of the deputies and the leadership of the faction “opposition bloc” in Parliament in support of the judicial reform decided to create a new opposition platform.
“I disagree with the part of deputies from the faction “Opposition bloc”, with the leadership of our party and announce that we, together with our colleagues, associates who did not vote for this judicial reform or voted against it, will create an opposition platform within the “Opposition bloc”, – quotes Interfax Novinsky.
He stressed that this decision is not a split in the party and in the faction.
See also:
The acclaimed Rada approved the judicial reform. A roll-call vote
We will remind, Rada approved a bill that will launch the judicial reform and provides for changes in several codes, as well as innovations that has caused a stormy debate. Some MPs in the hall were outraged by the law and stated that it is contrary to the Constitution. For a long time in the hall were heard cries of “Shame!” and just before the vote, MPs complained Paruby on “knopkodavstvo” during consideration of amendments to the document.
Before the vote, Ruslan Knyazevich from the BPP said that the Rada Committee on legal policy and justice withdrew the bill all controversial points.
The provisions of the bill provide for the introduction of e-court it is the substance of the proceedings with the use of information technology. Special attention is paid in the bill to ensure that the activities of the Supreme Court.
Previously to the draft judicial reform MPs have submitted a record number of edits – 5,5 thousand. The project of judicial reform in the presidential edition was indignant in “Homeland” and “Samopomich”. Say the judges, whose competence and engagement are often in doubt, get full power over the participants in the process. They will have the right to assign large fines and even criminal penalties for minor violations.