Lutsenko explained why it believes the legal actions of an agent “Catherine” in “amber” the case of the Rosenblatt

Agent of the National anti-corruption Bureau “Catherine” acted within the legislation of Ukraine during the provoking a people’s Deputy Borislav Rosenblatt for a bribe.

About it on air of TSN.Week said Prosecutor General Yury Lutsenko.

See also:

“Some Latin American carnival.” NABOO conflict with the GPU and the SBU after the failure of the operation in GMS

“Rosenblatt wrote a statement on the provocations of his bribe. He was offered, he could theoretically legal to do. What is the provocation of a bribe in the interpretation of the European court and Ukrainian law? This is when the officer is invited to make deliberately criminal actions. If an official is offered something he can do, such as Rosenblatt to vote for the bill or to create a joint venture, and on top of it requires money for it, then it is necessary to take for corruption. If the officer offered to buy a kilo of heroin or two machine guns, which kill people, or come up with a passport, which a priori does not represent the Iranian, who lives a few months in Ukraine is provoking the officer to commit a crime, which without this provocation would not have been committed. By doing so, law enforcement should be responsible for the provocation, and the one he provoked, is discharged. This practice exists in Europe and in Ukraine”, – considers Lutsenko.

See also:

Intelligence network have not suffered Sytnik told how the conflict between the security forces impact on NABOO

However, he declined to call the conflict of the GPU and the NABOO fight.

“The task of the General Prosecutor’s office and other law enforcement agencies – to work on the basis of the law. Every employee of law enforcement bodies, including the NEB, which is beyond the limits of the law should be stopped. Our conversations about the democratic, legal state is a fiction. We have cooperation with NABU. Effective. Of the 50 cases which the NAB has sent to the court, there are 20 according to the materials of the SBU and the GPU,” – said the Prosecutor General.

He gave the example of work between two departments, namely, the detention of judges from the Dnieper and the arrest of a smuggler from Odessa.

November 29 it became known about detention of the agent of NABOO by the SBU, which had received permission from the GPO. We are talking about the transfer of 15 thousand dollars Dina Emahool, first Deputy Chairman of the State migration service. The SMS said that “for several months, agent of NABU, the son of former people’s Deputy from Party of regions Yury Boyarsky, executing illegal instructions of individual heads of NABOO, repeatedly tried to provoke Dean Pimanova, offering large bribes for acceptance of illegal decisions on legalization in Ukraine citizens of Vietnam and Iran, which did not even exist in reality.”

To NAB the actions of the SBU and the GPU is called “diversion”. According to the report, the essence of “sabotage” is that officials of the SBU, allegedly using information that became known to them in the course of execution of official duties (implementation of listening of telephone numbers within the framework of investigations of NABOO) “not just disclose this information to one of the objects of secret investigative actions, undoing six-month detectives NABOO, but was recruited this person for further illegal pressure and criminal prosecution of employees of the National Bureau”.

Lutsenko explained why it believes the legal actions of an agent “Catherine” in “amber” the case of the Rosenblatt

Comments