“Pure provocation”: Lutsenko explained the legality of the detention of the agent of NABOO
The Prosecutor’s office explained the legality of detention of the employee of NABOO, who allegedly offered a bribe to the Deputy Chairman of the LCA.
This was during the briefing said the Prosecutor General Yury Lutsenko, reports espresso.
According to him, militiamen have no right to invite the government official to accept a knowingly unlawful decision and to expect, what amount he will call. According to him, this was pure provocation.
The GMR official said the details of the case about the bribe from the agent NABOO
“Translate, to make it clear: if I have someone now from the present you offered to buy me drugs, it is provocation”, – Lutsenko explained.
According to him, the same is the position of the Supreme court and European courts.
“The incitement by the police takes place when the relevant law enforcement officials or persons acting on their instructions, not limited to passive investigation and to establish crimes affect the entity, and entice him to commit a crime who would otherwise would not have been made” – read Lutsenko definition of the European court.
The attorney General added that in such cases the person to the crime the police were provoked, exempt from punishment, and Ukraine has the same law.
Videosu and prosecutors tore a special operation to NAB
November 30, 12:51
We will remind, on November 29 it became known about detention of the agent of NABOO by the SBU, which had received permission from the GPO. We are talking about the transfer of 15 thousand dollars Dina Emahool, first Deputy Chairman of the State migration service. In the LCA stated that “for several months, agent of NABU, the son of former people’s Deputy from Party of regions Yury Boyarsky, executing illegal instructions of individual heads of NABOO, repeatedly tried to provoke Dean Pimanova, offering large bribes for acceptance of illegal decisions on legalization in Ukraine citizens of Vietnam and Iran, which did not even exist in reality.”
To NAB the actions of the SBU and the GPU is called “diversion”. According to the report, the essence of “sabotage” is that officials of the SBU, allegedly using information that became known to them in the course of execution of official duties (implementation of listening of telephone numbers within the framework of investigations of NABOO) “not just disclose this information to one of the objects of secret investigative actions, undoing six-month detectives NABOO, but was recruited this person for further illegal pressure and criminal prosecution of employees of the National Bureau”.
- the Prosecutor General’s office
Saw a bug — Ctrl+Enter
Letter to the editor
Leave your comment
Leave your comment